name: Highlighting issue description: Missing or incorrect highlights or you want to change the way something is highlighted labels: [ highlights ] body: - type: markdown attributes: value: | # Before reporting Please perform the following steps before reporting an issue. - I have updated my neovim version to latest _master_. - I have updated my plugin to the latest version. - I have run `:TSUpdate`. - I have inspected the syntax tree using https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/playground and made sure that no `ERROR` nodes are in the syntax tree. nvim-treesitter can not guarantee correct highlighting in the presence of `ERROR`s -- in this case, please report the bug directly at corresponding parser's repository. (You can find all repository URLs in [README.md](https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#supported-languages).) - I have used `:TSHighlightCapturesUnderCursor` from https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/playground to inspect which highlight groups Neovim is using and that legacy syntax highlighting is not interfering (i.e., what you are observing is actual tree-sitter highlighting). - type: textarea attributes: label: Describe the highlighting problem description: A clear and concise description of what should be highlighted in a different way. validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Example snippet that causes the problem description: Please provide an example snippet in plain text that causes the problem. validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Tree-sitter parsing result description: | Please provide the output of `:TSPlaygroundToggle` from https://github.com/nvim-treesitter/playground (screenshot or plain text) with the following options enabled (pressing the key): - `I` (name of the parsed language) - `t` (toggle injected languages) - `a` (show anonymous nodes) placeholder: | This should look somehow like this: ``` preproc_ifdef [0, 0] - [4, 6] cpp "#ifdef" [0, 0] - [0, 6] cpp name: identifier [0, 7] - [0, 17] cpp preproc_def [1, 0] - [2, 0] cpp "#define" [1, 0] - [1, 7] cpp name: identifier [1, 8] - [1, 16] cpp value: preproc_arg [1, 16] - [1, 27] cpp "\n" [1, 27] - [2, 0] cpp alternative: preproc_else [2, 0] - [4, 0] cpp "#else" [2, 0] - [2, 5] cpp preproc_def [3, 0] - [4, 0] cpp "#define" [3, 0] - [3, 7] cpp name: identifier [3, 8] - [3, 16] cpp value: preproc_arg [3, 16] - [3, 29] cpp ``` validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Example screenshot description: | Please provide a screenshot of the current highlighting. Please also tell us the `:h colorscheme` you are using and how to install it. If applicable, you can also upload a screenshot with the contents of `:TSHighlightCapturesUnderCursor`. validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Expected behavior description: | A clear and concise description of what you expect to be changed. You can provide screenshot of other editors or traditional Vim highlighting that don't show this problem or show a screenshot how nvim-treesitter highlighting would look like when a problematic query would be removed/altered. - type: textarea attributes: label: Output of `:checkhealth nvim-treesitter` render: markdown validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Output of `nvim --version` render: text validations: required: true - type: textarea attributes: label: Additional context description: Add any context about the problem here.